We have discarded the premises and protocols of our cultures and customs, and have opted to ape the present day technologies and their tactics, because we believe in undertaking so, we are truly modernized and upscale/Trending toward intellectual acuity and astuteness. However, our present culture, is infact adaptable and having more affinity to the present day technologies.
I interacted with Trey really a bit online, and twice spent time with him in 3 dimensions. Trey was 1 of the kindest, most interesting, generous people I’ve ever met. He was actually one of the good guys in social media, and his background in theology and storytelling gave him a refreshingly unique outlook on all of this. He will be missed, and if the outpouring from the social media community is any barometer, his influence on others was probably far greater than he knew.
We claim that weshould interpret these rules as (formal) expressions of the methods we will need (or infact we have) to converge towards frequent contents in communication. These rulesare -we may possibly say – the strategic backbones of communication. By these indicates, wemay give substance to Davidson’s proposal of what he calls strategy” of convergence. Before addressing this point, let us verify the second aspect of the blindspot in Davidson’s theory.
That the corporate sector would control all communication was a given the only fight was over which sectors and which firms would get the ideal deals. The public was for the most component unaware of these debates. The drafting and struggles over the Telecommunications Act of 1996 had been hardly discussed in the news media, except in the enterprise and trade press, where the legislation was covered as a story of value to investors and managers, not citizens, or even shoppers.