Picture a future where killer military robots mow down extremist dissidents and feast on their dead flesh. Does that sound like the bizarre plot from a really bad science fiction film? It really is not. It is truly a incredibly real U.S. military system.
DARPA’s interest in walking robots has gone beyond just the 4-legged variety. In 2015, the U.S. military investigation agency hosted a DARPA Robotics Challenge intended to test the capabilities of bipedal humanoid robots in a range of real-globe circumstances. The aim was to push for humanoid robots that could successfully navigate autos and buildings like humans. Ideally, such robots would even have the coordination to deal with tools in accomplishing particular tasks. It does not take a large leap of the imagination to see how such handy robots, capable of going wherever humans can go, could prove handy in a battlefield situation.
On a considerably smaller sized scale, the Navy is investing in unmanned underwater automobiles, including the Knifefish , a 19-foot-long torpedo-shaped minesweeper that can operate autonomously for days at a time. The system would represent a considerable improvement on existing mine-clearing technologies, which normally call for additional people and expense much more money. But even in this case, funding is at threat. In 2012, the U.S. Navy stated it planned to invest in underwater drones even far more advanced than the Knifefish — larger vessels that can conduct underwater surveillance for long durations. But no income has been guaranteed yet.
Could the man in the loop” be removed from robotic weapons? The Israel Defence Forces have installed combat proven” robot machineguns along the country’s borders. When sensors detect an intruder, the barrel pivots to adhere to him. A human soldier, watching the scene remotely through a fibre-optic hyperlink, decides no matter if or not to problem a warning (by means of a loudspeaker) or press the fire button. The robot sentry, the Samson Remote Weapon Station, could function without human intervention, says David Ishai of Rafael, its Israeli manufacturer, primarily based in Haifa. But, he says, switching to automatic mode would be a poor idea—and illegal to boot.
Who would want a robot pet? Effectively, turns out a lot of people would. There have been modest signs of this coming through the likes of little ones toys, originating with cuddly stuffed animal toys, building to plastic animals that ‘bark’ and ‘meow’ to back-flipping dog toys. The future expects robot pets to develop into a issue, with the likes of toy company Hasbro developing a line of robotic cats that are aimed at the elderly.